Temporary answer to that, Energicenter Nord has to research
February 5th, 2006As we mentioned before, there are some things Energicenter Nord (supplies electricity, leader of the project Windmills at Hanstholm Harbour) has to research before Viborg county will take any action in the case of Windmills at Hanstholm Harbour. While we are waiting, we did our own research and therefore we can give you a temporary answer.
1) Energicenter Nord has been requested to research if there will be any demands from the aviation regarding powerful aircraft warning lights on the mills. Is this the case, then the project will be stopped.
Weâve researched this case: The aviation doesnât have any problem with mills being set up in the area. No powerful aircraft warning lights are demanded.
2) Energicenter Nord has been requested to get a grip on Nordisk Folkecenter for Vedvarende Energi. The latest owner of the fourth current mill. As they pronounced in their registered objection, they, not in any way, do have the intention to break down their mill. In order to place the new mills the four current mills will have to be taken down.
Weâve researched this case: Nordisk Folkecenter for Vedvarende Energi owns the 2nd mill south. There are several grounds for at they are not willing to take it down. One of them is that itâs not in societyâs economic interest to break a well running mill down. They do not want to pronounce any further in this case
3) Energicenter Nord has been requested to research if the project is alien to The Harbour Law. A public owned harbour, may only involve harbour relating business. No matter how you twist and turn it, it is more than doubtful, how far windmills are a harbour relating business.
Weâve researched this case: At this very moment itâs at the ministry of Transport and Energy, where there is being related to harbour law § 9 and respectively part 5 and 6:
Part 5. The harbour understands construction and drift of a harbour infrastructure, covering quays, harbour basins, bounding land, and can place cranes, warehouses and similar, to serve ships, loaders, ground owners etc.
Part 6. As far as the conditions in some occasions will allow it, the minister of Traffic is able to, after a request from the municipality, allow that the harbour, apart from mentioned in part 5, could mean harbour related operating business either self or in cooperation with a private business.
This means that windmills primary, are not a type of business for a publicly owned harbour. But this law is â as all others â a guideline and exceptions are found. In this case it might be the case that the ministry judges that the harbour has that much ground, that they canât use of it for harbour related purposes only.
Is this the case, it makes sense that the harbour receives (a form of) dispensing and with it, opportunities for extending its business to not-harbour related activities. The latter might be renting ground for windmills.
The ministry has requested the harbour for further information regarding the case, but hasnât received anything yet. And before that happens, can they not regard the case.
Finally the coastal authority has brought out, that there is a special procedure for EIA (environmental impact assessment) relating âconstruction at sea territoryâ. It contains an extra hearing-phase regarding a great number of authorities and organizations, before there can be started with an EIA.
Weâve researched this case: We have two topics:
2.1) The coastal authority should only hear public authorities (Administration of Navigation and Hydrography, Administration of Fishing, Administration of Environment etc.)
2.2) The coastal authority estimates their projects, where these should be finished planning before they come and estimate. This means that the âbuilding-gentlemenâ should have completed their plans before they get there.







